[Npoc-discuss] Invitation to participate

Joan Kerr joankerr at fbsc.org
Tue Dec 6 12:48:52 UTC 2016


HI Raoul,

Thank you for your interest in attending the Intersessional meeting.  The
Excom will be reviewing the responses and make a decision in the next few
days.

Regards,
Joan

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:

> *Name/Organization:*
>>
> Raoul Plommer, Electronic Frontier Finland, Open Knowledge Finland
>
>> *ICANN Affiliation (WGs, etc.):*
>>
> NCUC as an individual member, NPOC as an organisational member
>
>> *Reason for wanting to attend in person:*
>>
> Firstly, I am simply much more effective in person. I also understand
> other people and the issues they present better, when discussing issues
> face to face.
>
> Secondly, I am really quite intrigued in the way that NCPH does its
> business and would like to see first hand, how we negotiate and make
> satisfactory compromises with our commercial counterparts. I think this
> would be a great learning experience for me and I would definitely be able
> to contribute more in to the work, if I was able to join you for the
> intersessional meeting.
>
> Thirdly, I was encouraged to apply by the intention to invite new faces to
> the meeting and I think I can still be counted as a newbie in ICANN, since
> I've been tagging along only since March.
>
> I would also want to discuss the coming NomCom review as well. That surely
> fits the "longer-range substantial community issues and collaboration
> with Senior ICANN Staff on strategic and operational issues that impact the
> community." -specification.
>
>> *Level of participation in NPOC (explain):*
>>
> So far, I've hardly participated in the work of NPOC and I feel, that this
> would be a good opportunity for NPOC to lure me into working for it. I am
> still undecided, on which constituency within NCSG I should be
> concentrating on and if I got more exposure on the actual work and
> negotiations of NPOC, that might well tilt the balance in NPOC's favor.
>
>> *In addition to the above, attendees would be required to write a blog
>> report maximum 2 weeks after the meeting and join an ICANN working
>> group/NPOC committee.*
>>
> Fair enough - I'll actually try to get into the habit of writing a report
> while I'm still at the meeting, so one could expect to get the report in
> just a few days time after the meeting.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Raoul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Npoc-discuss mailing list
> Npoc-discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-discuss/attachments/20161206/44125237/attachment.html>


More information about the Npoc-discuss mailing list