[registrars] Revised draft for TF2

Eric Brunner-Williams brunner at nic-naa.net
Tue Apr 13 14:08:13 UTC 2004


Thomas,

I suggest adopting the language that the W3C's P3P activity has evolved.
It isn't the only possible choice, but they have spent some time on it,
so terms like <purpose> and who's purpose is expressed in a <purpose>
statement, the sense I get of this morning's exchange of notes between
Ross and yourself, could be about well-defined terms, rather than a new
discussion about terms and the application, in our case, whois policy
varients.

Also, could you post a text copy of the word document?

Eric



More information about the registrars mailing list