[Rt4-whois] Gap analysis - accuracy - revised version [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Thu Sep 15 05:13:48 UTC 2011

Hi again all,

I've now had a chance to work through the transcripts of our meetings in Singapore, and have updated the accuracy gaps analysis with some additional comments from those meetings. This revised version is attached. There is obviously more to be done on this issue/section, but I wanted to share this update before our meeting next week.

I've also been thinking of ways that ICANN could target some of its compliance resources towards registrars and name spaces with high levels of inaccuracy, and I look forward to discussing those next week.

Kind regards,

Peter

From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu]
Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2011 5:55 PM
To: Nettlefold, Peter
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: Re: Gap analysis - accuracy [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hi Peter

Thanks for sending this new draft out to the list with plenty of time for review before our next call.

All - I hope that, as before, you will contribute your thoughts and comments on the draft.

One format issue - I think it's better to have the text reflect the comment and then footnote the contributor's details.  That way, people focus on what is said rather than focusing on the identity of the contributor.  Let me know what you think of this.

Kind regards

Emily

On 8 September 2011 01:00, Nettlefold, Peter <Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au>> wrote:
Hello all,

Attached is a draft gap analysis relating to WHOIS data accuracy.

As with the accessibility/privacy section, I have not had time to cover all the issues, complete all the analyses, balance all the arguments, and so on in this first draft.  However, I hope that it has enough structure and shape to encourage comment, debate, and input as we prepare for Marina del Rey.

One issue I've struggled with is the structure. As you've seen, I've basically broken the gap analysis in two (privacy/access and accuracy) because:

*       these two areas seemed to attract the most comment from our stakeholders;

*       they are clearly drawn out as issues in the AoC provisions on WHOIS; and

*       many of the other 'gaps' we initially identified seem to be sub-components of these two broader issues or to be closely linked to them.

Now that there is a draft in this form, I'm hoping that others will comment on whether this structure will allow us to sensibly cover all the gaps or if there is a better way to pull the pieces together.

Cheers,

Peter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties.

If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

   [cid:~WRD170.jpg]

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>

www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk>

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties.

If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110915/a2e775f4/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD170.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: ~WRD170.jpg
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110915/a2e775f4/WRD170.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WHOIS Gap Analysis - Accuracy v2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 48067 bytes
Desc: WHOIS Gap Analysis - Accuracy v2.docx
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110915/a2e775f4/WHOISGapAnalysis-Accuracyv2.docx 