[Rt4-whois] Recommendations - updated language SOURCED

Wed Nov 30 16:17:36 UTC 2011

Many thanks Susan.  If you could get the new language out to the list by
the top of the hour (ie 40 minutes or so) that would be great.  Please use
this version of the document.

On 30 November 2011 15:35, Susan Kawaguchi <susank at fb.com> wrote:

>  Hi Emily
>
>  I have reviewed the recommendations document and I think once Lutz'
> recommendation is included  we have captures everything.  On the proxy
> proposal James had suggested less detail on what the best practices would
> be.  I can agree with that.
>
>  I am currently on my way into the office and can send proposed language
> at that time.
>
>  I have not reviewed the full report after the revisions last night and
> would like the opportunity to do so
>
>  What is the current cut off time?
>
>  Susan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Emily Taylor" <emily at emilytaylor.eu> wrote:
>
>   Dang!
>
> This document is supposed to contain all of our recommendations.
>
> Thanks Lynn, good catch.  I was intending to put it in and forgot AGAIN.
>
> Trying not to introduce additional language at this late stage Lynn.  Did
> we already agree a consumer awareness programme recommendation?  I can't
> find it, but happy to be corrected.
>
>
> I will re-issue this document with Lutz's draft - Lutz, OK if I tweak some
> of the language?
>
>
>
> On 30 November 2011 14:51, < <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>
> lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>>  I made a quick read Emily and have no objections to these
>> recommendations.
>>
>> Are these just the recommendations with some remaining contention amongst
>> the team members?
>>
>> I was looking for Lutz's recommendation on a centralized interface for
>> ease of fnding WHOIS data.
>> Also want to make sure we recommend that ICANN develop and execute an
>> ongoing consumer awareness program.
>> I will be happy to draft that recommendation.
>> Lynn
>>
>>
>>  -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations - updated language SOURCED
>> From: Emily Taylor < <emily at emilytaylor.eu>emily at emilytaylor.eu>
>> Date: Wed, November 30, 2011 9:14 am
>> To: <rt4-whois at icann.org>rt4-whois at icann.org
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Following the queries on the list overnight, I have tried as best I can
>> to piece together the language of the recommendations.The documents I
>> checked against were <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/21135832/Findings+-+conclusions+-+definitions.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1319625303000>
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/21135832/Findings+-+conclusions+-+definitions.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1319625303000(Draft Recommendations discussed in Dakar),  and this <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/21135832/Current+WRT+Recommendations+-+v1+-+Nov+21.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1321978947000>
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/21135832/Current+WRT+Recommendations+-+v1+-+Nov+21.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1321978947000(The first consolidated draft of what was agreed in Dakar, and MdR).
>>
>> However, like others, I have found it confusing to understand from the
>> multiple drafts posted on the private WIKI, but I do think the draft of 21
>> November (second link above) is a fair representation of what we as a team
>> negotiated and agreed.
>>
>> I have gone back to text that we agreed in MdR and Dakar, and tried only
>> to add text in the following circumstances:
>>
>> - Where the sense was unclear, or we were tasking the wrong people
>> - Where the text has evolved through consent of the team since Dakar
>> (IDNs and Proxies)
>> - Where the text has come from another, stable source (compliance
>> recommendation on WDRP).  There, as the author and having received a
>> comment from James on the correct parties to task, I have cleaned up the
>> language.
>>
>> I hope I have done a fair job on this.
>>
>> I have noted one place (privacy recs.) where there is contested
>> language.  My proposal - sorry James - is that we revert to our agreed text
>> from Dakar on this.
>>
>> If I have made mistakes on the source language, I apologise, this is not
>> intentional and I am happy to be corrected.
>>
>> Please carefully consider these recommendations.  They can be improved,
>> the language could be better, clearer, but they are what we agreed.  Please
>> let me have any show stoppers by 1600 UTC.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Emily
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  *
>> *
>>
>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
>> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
>>  <emily at emilytaylor.eu>emily at emilytaylor.eu
>>
>>  * <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/>www.etlaw.co.uk*
>>
>>
>> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
>> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rt4-whois mailing list
>>  <Rt4-whois at icann.org>Rt4-whois at icann.org
>>  <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> *
> *
>
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
>  <emily at emilytaylor.eu>emily at emilytaylor.eu
>
> * <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>www.etlaw.co.uk*
>
> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
>   _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>

-- 

*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/bc5fc0dc/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Recommendations - SOURCE EXPLANATION.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 75264 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/bc5fc0dc/Recommendations-SOURCEEXPLANATION.doc 