[Rt4-whois] Executive Summary - with new Findings and Recommendations Text

[Emily Taylor]

Hi Kathy

Thank you for bringing this work forward.

Good, minimalist work on the Exec summary, and I like what you've done on
the studies, although personally I liked the previous language.

I would be in favour of reverting to the bold statement about the system
being broken and needing fixing.  It was picked up in many of the articles
about the draft report, and it now reads as if we've changed our mind about
this, and it's a bit too watered down.  Re-reading the situation on IDNs
makes me believe strongly that we need to convey in simple terms a sense of
*urgency.*
*
*
It would be great- and easier to see what's happening, if the agreed
findings and recommendations could be accepted (ie no longer in tracked
changes) so that we can see clearly what is new.

Alice - could you do that please?

Also, Alice, for completeness we need to include the findings and
recommendations from the new Compliance Chapter that I sent around
yesterday - please have that marked up as people have not yet considered it.

Finally, Kathy you mentioned that the WDRP recommendation has now been
replaced by the new compliance recommendations.  Actually, we decided in
Costa Rica to keep the WDRP recommendation but to move it into data
accuracy, where it fits more logically.   Alice - could you do that please.
 Keep the text as it is, not marked up, but just put a comment in to
highlight that it's been moved.

Thanks again, Kathy, good work.

Emily

On 27 April 2012 22:53, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:

>  Hi All,
> I sat down with three screens open and tried to work my way through the
> Executive Summary (as promised in our meeting Wed). I referenced our
> original report, slides from the Public Forum, texts that Alice has
> finalized, and Comment Summary that Alice prepared. In addition to a few
> edits to the text to remove a few "rough edges," I tried to cut and paste
> all the new texts for Findings and Recommendations. No promises, but I did
> the best I could :-)!
>
> Overall, I think this reads very well. I like how the findings and
> recommendations flow... and I think our work shows!
> *If there are some quick edits over the weekend, I may put them in, but
> otherwise, I pass the pen to Alice, and ask her to post this with our other
> new sections for review and comment. *
>
> Have a good weekend,
> Kathy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>


-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120428/90e0de93/attachment.html