[Rt4-whois] Executive Summary [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Seth M Reiss
seth.reiss at lex-ip.com
Wed May 2 01:37:47 UTC 2012
My comments on the current draft of Recommendation 10: Data Access- Privacy
and Proxy Services
Findings: Para 2: I agree with Peter to delete the word "legitimate".
Recommendations: top of next page beginning with "ICANN could, for example,
use a mix of": I would delete the phrase "to encourage proxy/privacy
service providers to become accredited". Leaving the phrase in suggests
that ICANN could tolerate a community of non-accredited proxy/privacy
providers and I feel this is the wrong message to send.
Same page bullet two: I am still confused who is provide the full details
and if the details are of the service provider or the beneficiary user.
Last paragraph last bullet. I like Peter's comment "Clarifying the issue of
rights/responsibilities/liabilities should be an essential part of the
proxy/privacy discussion, with the goal being clear and comprehensive
guidance for the community." (I've tried to improve it a little). Can we
place this statement above as a recommendation separate from the bullet
points, perhaps as the second, third or fourth paragraph under
Recommendations. I sense that strengthening this statement could address
Susan's concerns as well.
Seth
From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Nettlefold, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:51 PM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Executive Summary [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all,
In advance of tonight's call, I just wanted to note that there seem to be
two versions on v6 out there - one I sent yesterday with 'v6 pn' in the
title, and more recent version sent by Susan with 'v6 Susan's comments'.
I'm not commenting on the content as such, but just noting the version
issue.
Cheers,
Peter
From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012 9:53 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Executive Summary
Hi All,
I am sorry that I will not be able to attend the meeting in a few hours
(it's at 2am my time). Thanks to everyone for all the discussion and
editing! I support the Executive Summary and IDN Comments.
I wanted to share a particular support for the new proxy/privacy point that
Peter added.
providing clear and unambiguous guidance on the rights and responsibilities
of registered name holders, and how those should be managed in the
privacy/proxy environment
I'm happy to work with Alice on removing all the comments I inserted... and
regards to all!
Kathy
:
Thank you all for your hard work on the executive summary. I have made a
few comments but for the most part I am in agreement with the current draft.
Talk to you tonight.
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.
Phone - 650 485-6064
_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam,
undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway
products please visit www.axway.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120501/4b66b567/attachment.html
More information about the Rt4-whois
mailing list