[RZERC] FOR REVIEW: DRAFT Minutes 28 February teleconference
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Sun Mar 12 07:09:39 UTC 2017
> On 11 Mar 2017, at 23:43, Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com> wrote:
>
> nstead of the current “reactionary” wording of:
>
> 'RZERC should be a reactionary committee and consider issues raised by its members, PTI staff or CSC’
>
> we use the following wording:
>
> 'RZERC should consider and react as appropriate to issues raised by its members, PTI staff or CSC’
Works for me.
> Does this capture the sense of our discussion?
Yes.
More information about the RZERC
mailing list