[RZERC] FOR REVIEW: DRAFT Minutes 28 February teleconference

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Sun Mar 12 07:09:39 UTC 2017


> On 11 Mar 2017, at 23:43, Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> nstead of the current “reactionary” wording of:
> 
> 'RZERC should be a reactionary committee and consider issues raised by its members, PTI staff or CSC’
> 
> we use the following wording:
> 
> 'RZERC should consider and react as appropriate to issues raised by its members, PTI staff or CSC’

Works for me.

> Does this capture the sense of our discussion?

Yes.



More information about the RZERC mailing list