[RZERC] FINAL RZERC Feedback on the Updated Plan for Continuing the Root KSK Rollover

[Russ Mundy]

Duane,

I want to give you particular thanks for leading RZERC and us through the development and publication of the first RZERC advice to the Board.

I agree that it would be good to discuss if procedures should be updated to reflect what we’ve learned through this process.

I do have one question:  Can I now share the document we produced with SSAC?  They have not yet finished their response and some members have asked to see the RZERC response.

Thanks again,

Russ

> On Aug 7, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Wessels, Duane via RZERC <rzerc at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Thank you very much, Peter.  I appreciate everyone's effort, input, and patience in getting this
> advice completed by our deadline.  I will ask our staff support to prepare the final version
> and post it here to the list.  Kaveh, as the Board representative, could you please deliver
> RZERC's response to the Board.
> 
> With the experience of RZERC's first advice behind us I would like to suggest that we take
> time in a future meeting to debrief and consider whether or not changes to our procedures 
> are warranted.  Since our August regular meeting is coming up quickly and already business that
> we need to discuss, I feel we should wait until September for the procedures discussion.
> 
> DW
> 
> 
> On 8/7/18, 9:32 AM, "Peter Koch" <peter at denic.de on behalf of pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
> 
>    Duane, all,
> 
>    On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:13:38PM +0000, Wessels, Duane via RZERC wrote:
> 
>> Steve and I have been discussing some options for moving forward on this advice.  Referring to our procedures, I feel that our current situation fits the definition of Rough Consensus, under which minority viewpoints are considered but not necessarily accommodated.
> 
>    thank you for this suggestion, which perfectly is in line with our Operational Procedures.
>    While I still firmly believe that the additional sentence is unjustified, I do consent
>    with the gist of the main message.  Given that this is our first response, I would,
>    after careful consideration, still not without a headache, not want to add a minority
>    view statement.  For clarity, this should mean the version posted by Steve on 31st July
>    would be submitted unaltered.
> 
>    Best regards,
>       Peter
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RZERC mailing list
> RZERC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc