[RZERC] Possible response to future KSK rollover plan

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Nov 26 11:16:40 UTC 2019



> On 25 Nov 2019, at 22:23, Wessels, Duane via RZERC <rzerc at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Given that the deadline for feedback in January 31, I'd like to propose that we first come to agreement via discussion on the list whether or not RZERC should submit a comment.  Assuming there is agreement to do so we can use our meetings in December and January to work on the text of the comment.

Who said anything about a January meeting?

BTW, where are the (draft?) minutes from this month's meeting? There's nothing on our web page either.

> Please provide your input as to whether or not RZERC should provide a comment by Wednesday, December 4.

IMO, this is a no-op since the proposed rollover plan doesn't involve "major architectural changes to the DNS root". So it's out of scope for RZERC. It would of course be a different story if there was an algorithm roll or something like that which affected the size of signed responses or the time to validate them.

I suppose we could send a no comment response, just to remind the rest of ICANN that we're still here.



More information about the RZERC mailing list