[RZERC] RZERC Working Drafts

[Wessels, Duane]

> On Jun 26, 2020, at 2:45 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 Jun 2020, at 22:48, Danielle Rutherford <danielle.rutherford at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Following up on our discussions from the June teleconference I am sending you the links to the working drafts for the two RZERC work items.
> 
> I’m confused. I thought we only agreed to put up a shared doc for the ZONEMD proposal and punt the signing root-servers.net stuff to RSSAC. There was a consensus that RZERC does not have the resources to study the implications of signing root-servers.net. The implication was someone else should do that work and RZERC would consider their findings.
> 
> I have read the transcript. There’s no mention of putting up a shared doc on signing root-servers.net. Or that RZERC was going to work on such a thing. Our general view seemed to be that RZERC would send the current document to RSSAC and/or SSAC and ask them to consider next steps.
> 

Hi Jim,

My recap of the discussion is that we would suggest a joint SSAC/RSSAC(caucus) study on the question of signing root-servers.net.  Geoff suggested we send the current document "almost as-is" to the chairs of those groups.  Also we would send a courtesy CC to other groups.  So my suggestion is to start with the  document as uploaded by Danielle and edit it as necessary so we can send it to these other groups and they will understand what we are asking of them.  Does that sound reasonable to you?


> BTW, where are the minutes of last week’s conf call? The transcripts are all very well. However they don’t clearly show what decisions were taken, what the action points are, who’s responsible for those APs, etc, etc. I’m curious too why there’s been a switch from minutes to transcripts and why that doesn’t seem to have been agreed or even discussed by RZERC.

Nothing has changed as far as I can tell.  Per the RZERC procedures, transcripts are published as soon as they are available.  Minutes are approved at the next meeting, and then published.  Draft minutes are typically sent to the group with the reminder and agenda for the next meeting.


DW

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4695 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rzerc/attachments/20200626/a119d257/smime.p7s>