[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: Welcome to the WS2 Jurisdiction Subgroup!

Thu Aug 18 06:50:34 UTC 2016

On Wednesday 17 August 2016 11:40 PM, tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn wrote:
>
> For the purpose of sharing the inconvenience of difficult time for the
> call, I also accept time rotation.
>

It will be good to see what are to be called 'off hours' or 'difficult
time' . If it is midnight to say 6 or 7 AM, I am not sure any
participant falls in that period for the 1300 hrs UTC slot.... But I am
just guessing... parminder

>  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Executive Director
>
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>
>             +216 52 385 114
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  
>
> Le 17 août 2016 à 18:35, McAuley, David <dmcauley at verisign.com
> <mailto:dmcauley at verisign.com>> a écrit :
>
> Thanks Greg and others for moving this forward.
>
>  
>
> I personally think that the time should be rotated to allow for a fair
> distribution of the inconvenience of participating in off-hours.
>
>  
>
> David
>
>  
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154
>
>  
>
> *From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of* Greg Shatan
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:30 PM
>
> *To:* Mike Silber
>
> *Cc:* ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: Welcome to the WS2 Jurisdiction
> Subgroup!
>
>  
>
> All,
>
>  
>
> Thanks for your comments to date.  We've heard from about a half-dozen
> members so far, and it would be helpful to hear from more before
> fixing a long-term slot or rotation.
>
>  
>
> In my view we need to accommodate our members as best we can, so we
> can do our work; those are the demographics we need to deal with.  I
> will note that "Iran and west" includes not only NA and EU, but also
> AF (as pointed out by Mike Silber) and SA, as well as the Middle East,
> Western Asia and portions of Central Asia.  I will also note that
> among the 4 respondents from "east of Iran" the votes for the 13:00
> time slot, there were 2 yes votes, 1 if need be and 1 no.
>
>  
>
> All that said, this is a decision to be made by the group, and as
> such, the more members' voices heard the better.  I'm not sure running
> another doodle poll would help, but I'd rather let the discussion go
> forward first.  One shortcoming of polls is that they do not allow for
> dialogue.  As such, if there is another poll, let's have it after
> further dialogue, so that the participants can keep in mind various
> viewpoints as they respond.
>
>  
>
> In the interests of transparency, here are the quantitative results
> from the Doodle poll.  I excluded all results involving the 05:00 time
> slot, since there was little support for this slot in any configuration.
>
>  
>
> Greg
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *FIXED TIME VS. ROTATION SURVEY*
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> *MEMBERS ONLY*
>
> 	
>
> *Yes*
>
> 	
>
> *If Need be*
>
> 	
>
> *No*
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 19:00 Fixed Time
>
> 	
>
> 18
>
> 	
>
> 1
>
> 	
>
> 4
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 13:00 Fixed Time
>
> 	
>
> 10
>
> 	
>
> 3
>
> 	
>
> 10
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 13/19 Rotation
>
> 	
>
> 11
>
> 	
>
> 7
>
> 	
>
> 5
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> *ALL PARTICIPANTS*
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 19:00 Fixed Time
>
> 	
>
> 21
>
> 	
>
> 2
>
> 	
>
> 7
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 13:00 Fixed Time
>
> 	
>
> 13
>
> 	
>
> 5
>
> 	
>
> 12
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 13/19 Rotation
>
> 	
>
> 13
>
> 	
>
> 9
>
> 	
>
> 8
>
> 	
>
>  
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> *TIME OF DAY SURVEY* (Yes : If Need Be : No)
>
> *MEMBERS ONLY*
>
> 	
>
> *Monday*
>
> 	
>
> *Tuesday*
>
> 	
>
> *Wednesday*
>
> 	
>
> *Thursday*
>
> 	
>
> *Friday*
>
> 19:00
>
> 	
>
> 20:0:9
>
> 	
>
> 16:1:11
>
> 	
>
> 17:1:10
>
> 	
>
> 17:0:11
>
> 	
>
> 14:0:14
>
> 13:00
>
> 	
>
> 10:2:17
>
> 	
>
> 17:4:11
>
> 	
>
> 14:3:11
>
> 	
>
> 14:2:12
>
> 	
>
> 15:2:11
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> *ALL PARTICIPANTS*
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 	
>
> * *
>
> 19:00
>
> 	
>
> 24:2:10
>
> 	
>
> 19:3:14
>
> 	
>
> 21:2:14
>
> 	
>
> 20:0:16
>
> 	
>
> 18:1:17
>
> 13:00
>
> 	
>
> 15:2:19
>
> 	
>
> 17:5:14
>
> 	
>
> 19:3:14
>
> 	
>
> 17:2:17
>
> 	
>
> 20:2:14
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Mike Silber <silber.mike at gmail.com
> <mailto:silber.mike at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:26, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu
> <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>
>  
>
> Greg:
>
> I think it makes sense to alternate the meeting time, especially if
> there was something near to a bimodal distribution of preferences.
> While it may be true that a (NA-EU) majority finds the 19:00 UTC time
> most convenient, by alternating we can incorporate the preferences of
> a larger segment of the group.
>
>  
>
> Just as aside - AF finds 19:00 convenient too, but it seems the
> thoughts of Africa are not that relevant
>
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20160818/d35ad5ae/attachment-0001.html>