[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: Welcome to the WS2 Jurisdiction Subgroup!

parminder parminder at itforchange.net
Tue Aug 23 16:13:01 UTC 2016



On Thursday 18 August 2016 11:40 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Parminder,
>
>
> 13:00 UTC is 6:00 am in the Pacific Time Zone, which includes the
> Western US (e.g., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland, Seattle,
> Phoenix, etc.) and Canada (e.g., Vancouver).  On the other end, 13:00
> UTC is 1 am in New Zealand. 

Thanks Greg,
That certainly is a problem. But so is 1900 UTC which is 1230 past
midnight in India, and 1 AM the entire world east of Bangladesh -- Id
say a considerably bigger part of the world. I think we need some
balancing of perspectives here.

>
> If we bring in 7:00 am,

Sorry, is this UTC?

parminder

> that takes in the Mountain Time Zone, which also includes a big swath
> of the US and Canada (e.g., Denver, Salt Lake City, Edmonton, Calgary,
> Winnipeg, etc.) as well as a portion of Central America (Guatemala, El
> Salvador, Nicaragua, etc.). If we include 11 pm, that brings in
> eastern Australia (e.g., Melbourne, Sydney, etc.)
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:50 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Wednesday 17 August 2016 11:40 PM, tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>     <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn> wrote:
>>
>>     For the purpose of sharing the inconvenience of difficult time
>>     for the call, I also accept time rotation.
>>
>
>     It will be good to see what are to be called 'off hours' or
>     'difficult time' . If it is midnight to say 6 or 7 AM, I am not
>     sure any participant falls in that period for the 1300 hrs UTC
>     slot.... But I am just guessing... parminder
>
>>      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>
>>     Executive Director
>>
>>     Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>>
>>     Phone: +216 98 330 114 <tel:%2B216%2098%20330%20114>
>>
>>                 +216 52 385 114 <tel:%2B216%2052%20385%20114>
>>
>>     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Le 17 août 2016 à 18:35, McAuley, David <dmcauley at verisign.com
>>     <mailto:dmcauley at verisign.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     Thanks Greg and others for moving this forward.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     I personally think that the time should be rotated to allow for a
>>     fair distribution of the inconvenience of participating in off-hours.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     David
>>
>>      
>>
>>     David McAuley
>>
>>     International Policy Manager
>>
>>     Verisign Inc.
>>
>>     703-948-4154 <tel:703-948-4154>
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>
>>     [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of* Greg
>>     Shatan
>>
>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:30 PM
>>
>>     *To:* Mike Silber
>>
>>     *Cc:* ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>>
>>     *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: Welcome to the WS2
>>     Jurisdiction Subgroup!
>>
>>      
>>
>>     All,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Thanks for your comments to date.  We've heard from about a
>>     half-dozen members so far, and it would be helpful to hear from
>>     more before fixing a long-term slot or rotation.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     In my view we need to accommodate our members as best we can, so
>>     we can do our work; those are the demographics we need to deal
>>     with.  I will note that "Iran and west" includes not only NA and
>>     EU, but also AF (as pointed out by Mike Silber) and SA, as well
>>     as the Middle East, Western Asia and portions of Central Asia.  I
>>     will also note that among the 4 respondents from "east of Iran"
>>     the votes for the 13:00 time slot, there were 2 yes votes, 1 if
>>     need be and 1 no.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     All that said, this is a decision to be made by the group, and as
>>     such, the more members' voices heard the better.  I'm not sure
>>     running another doodle poll would help, but I'd rather let the
>>     discussion go forward first.  One shortcoming of polls is that
>>     they do not allow for dialogue.  As such, if there is another
>>     poll, let's have it after further dialogue, so that the
>>     participants can keep in mind various viewpoints as they respond.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     In the interests of transparency, here are the quantitative
>>     results from the Doodle poll.  I excluded all results involving
>>     the 05:00 time slot, since there was little support for this slot
>>     in any configuration.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Greg
>>
>>      
>>
>>      
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *FIXED TIME VS. ROTATION SURVEY*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *MEMBERS ONLY*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Yes*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *If Need be*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *No*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     19:00 Fixed Time
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     18
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     1
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     4
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     13:00 Fixed Time
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     10
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     3
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     10
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     13/19 Rotation
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     11
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     7
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     5
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *ALL PARTICIPANTS*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     19:00 Fixed Time
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     21
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     2
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     7
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     13:00 Fixed Time
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     13
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     5
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     12
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     13/19 Rotation
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     13
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     9
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     8
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *TIME OF DAY SURVEY* (Yes : If Need Be : No)
>>
>>     *MEMBERS ONLY*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Monday*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Tuesday*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Wednesday*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Thursday*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     *Friday*
>>
>>     19:00
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     20:0:9
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     16:1:11
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     17:1:10
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     17:0:11
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     14:0:14
>>
>>     13:00
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     10:2:17
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     17:4:11
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     14:3:11
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     14:2:12
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     15:2:11
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *ALL PARTICIPANTS*
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     * *
>>
>>     19:00
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     24:2:10
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     19:3:14
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     21:2:14
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     20:0:16
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     18:1:17
>>
>>     13:00
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     15:2:19
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     17:5:14
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     19:3:14
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     17:2:17
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     20:2:14
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>     	
>>
>>      
>>
>>      
>>
>>      
>>
>>     On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Mike Silber
>>     <silber.mike at gmail.com <mailto:silber.mike at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:26, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu
>>     <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Greg:
>>
>>     I think it makes sense to alternate the meeting time, especially
>>     if there was something near to a bimodal distribution of
>>     preferences. While it may be true that a (NA-EU) majority finds
>>     the 19:00 UTC time most convenient, by alternating we can
>>     incorporate the preferences of a larger segment of the group.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Just as aside - AF finds 19:00 convenient too, but it seems the
>>     thoughts of Africa are not that relevant
>>
>>      
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction>
>>
>>      
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>     Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction>
>     _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction
>     mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>     <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20160823/ce6196f2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list