[Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal

[Greg Shatan]

Tijani,

That's a good point and something we have been meaning to confirm.  I will
add a question on that subject.

Greg


*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc at gmail.com


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
> wrote:

> Greg and Mathieu,
>
> I noticed that among the questions, there is nothing about the
> jurisdiction of contracts between ICANN and another party who is not based
> in one of the locations that you mentioned (registry based in France for
> example).
> Can you add a question about that?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114>
>             +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
>
>
> Le 21 févr. 2017 à 17:55, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> a écrit :
>
> Thanks Greg,
>
> I expect that ICANN legal might ask us some clarifying questions about the
> question, but it would be good to engage in this dialogue.
>
> As a demonstration that we also did our homework on the issue, it might be
> worth noting that the ICANN litigation documents (https://www.icann.org/
> resources/pages/governance/litigation-en) web page mentions :
> -          Several cases of litigations in US States out of California
> -          One case of litigation outside of the US only (the Pool.com
> <http://pool.com/> case (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/
> litigation-enwhich never lead to a formal court order, but within which
> ICANN seems to have argued against the choice of jurisdiction. I should
> also note that ICANN’s arguments were related to the specific circumstances
> of the case, and not necessarily applicable to other potential cases)
>
> Best
> Mathieu
>
> *De :* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-
> bounces at icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>] *De la part de* Greg
> Shatan
> *Envoyé :* mardi 21 février 2017 04:58
> *À :* ws2-jurisdiction
> *Objet :* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal
>
> All,
>
> Here is a revised version of the questions for ICANN legal, with the
> previous changes accepted and new changes based on our last call shown in
> track changes.
>
> Please reply if you have any questions or comments, or if you believe
> these are now ready to forward to the CCWG's legal committee.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
>
> *Greg Shatan*C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170222/746b82e2/attachment-0001.html>