[Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal

[Greg Shatan]

All,

The questions have been further revised in response to recent suggestions.
This is now in a Google Doc at
 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HslgBieiTl2LNT1CXNct7ZS1Qi5lZy3r8Y42CVzfIP8/edit?usp=sharing
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HslgBieiTl2LNT1CXNct7ZS1Qi5lZy3r8Y42CVzfIP8/edit?usp=sharing>
.

Word and PDF versions are attached as well.

I hope that we can complete these questions on Thursday's call (19:00 UTC).

Please review and provide comments.

Thanks!

Greg




*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc at gmail.com


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Tijani,
>
> That's a good point and something we have been meaning to confirm.  I will
> add a question on that subject.
>
> Greg
>
>
> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <
> tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn> wrote:
>
>> Greg and Mathieu,
>>
>> I noticed that among the questions, there is nothing about the
>> jurisdiction of contracts between ICANN and another party who is not based
>> in one of the locations that you mentioned (registry based in France for
>> example).
>> Can you add a question about that?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------
>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>> Executive Director
>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114>
>>             +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 21 févr. 2017 à 17:55, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> a écrit
>> :
>>
>> Thanks Greg,
>>
>> I expect that ICANN legal might ask us some clarifying questions about
>> the question, but it would be good to engage in this dialogue.
>>
>> As a demonstration that we also did our homework on the issue, it might
>> be worth noting that the ICANN litigation documents (
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation-en) web page
>> mentions :
>> -          Several cases of litigations in US States out of California
>> -          One case of litigation outside of the US only (the Pool.com
>> <http://pool.com/> case (https://www.icann.org/resourc
>> es/pages/governance/litigation-enwhich never lead to a formal court
>> order, but within which ICANN seems to have argued against the choice of
>> jurisdiction. I should also note that ICANN’s arguments were related to the
>> specific circumstances of the case, and not necessarily applicable to other
>> potential cases)
>>
>> Best
>> Mathieu
>>
>> *De :* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounc
>> es at icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>] *De la part de* Greg
>> Shatan
>> *Envoyé :* mardi 21 février 2017 04:58
>> *À :* ws2-jurisdiction
>> *Objet :* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Here is a revised version of the questions for ICANN legal, with the
>> previous changes accepted and new changes based on our last call shown in
>> track changes.
>>
>> Please reply if you have any questions or comments, or if you believe
>> these are now ready to forward to the CCWG's legal committee.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> *Greg Shatan*C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
>> S: gsshatan
>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170222/9dd2c193/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JurisdictionQuestiontoICANNLegalv2.doc.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 16300 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170222/9dd2c193/JurisdictionQuestiontoICANNLegalv2.doc-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JurisdictionQuestiontoICANNLegalv2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 420172 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170222/9dd2c193/JurisdictionQuestiontoICANNLegalv2-0001.pdf>