[Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: RESPONSE REQUESTED

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All
With all due respect, I strongly oppose detaching questions 1-3 from Q 4.
Either ALL 4Qs or nothing.
Pls collaborate
This is counterproductive that from the very begining few people oppose to
Q4
Regards
Kavouss

2017-01-09 17:56 GMT+01:00 Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>:

> I support all the revisions to 1-3 and to the preamble that were proposed
> and gained support on the recent call. Essentially I support sending out
> the text Greg sent in his Jan 7 email unmodified.
>
>
>
> If we conclude that a questionnaire must go out then I support questions
> 1-3 as widely supported in the survey we did  – with no question 4.
>
>
>
> MM: I agree with David here, although I would be happy if we simply detach
> Q4, work on it some more until it is acceptable, and send it out later.
>
> I note that all the discussion and disagreement about what to do next
> comes from Q4. Once again, it is holding us up. Let’s cut the Gordian knot
> and detach the 1-3 from it, please, and move on.
>
>
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy <http://spp.gatech.edu/>
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> Internet Governance Project
>
> http://internetgovernance.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170109/26a2321e/attachment.html>