[Ws2-transparency] Recommendation from Göran

[Michael Karanicolas]

Thanks for that, Chris. Sorry for the delay in responding, I'm just
travelling at the moment.

I am attaching a revised version with the DIDP edits as well. The only
changes from my end have been regarding the monitoring and evaluation role
and the review of decisions to invoke the "frivolous and vexatious"
exception, both of which are now recommended to be delegated to either the
Ombudsman *OR* the Complaints Officer.

I had been holding off on circulating because Ed (and possibly Alberto...)
had objected to that change, so I wanted to wait to see if anyone else
wanted to weigh in after my response as to why I thought the lack of
independence of the Complaints Officer wasn't disqualifying. If there are
further thoughts on that matter, please don't hesitate to make yourself
heard, as we can still reverse course if Ed's position resonates.




On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Wilson, Christopher <cwilson at 21cf.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, David.  Michael can add more, if needed, but the latest draft,
> which consisted of edits made by me, was sent to all by me on Jan. 12.  My
> edits were made in regard to feedback given on the plenary call with
> respect to the “interactions with governments” recommendation.  Also on
> January 12, Michael provided a response to the concerns raised on the
> plenary call.  I don’t believe he made additional substantive edits.
>
>
>
> My suggestion to the subgroup is to review those Jan. 12 emails first and
> foremost.  Additionally, Michael sent an email to the subgroup on Jan. 22
> noting that some minor tweaking to the draft will occur re the role of the
> Ombudsman, in response to feedback he received from his engagement with the
> Ombudsman subgroup rapporteur and the current Ombudsman.  He also responded
> via email to Ed on Jan. 24.
>
>
>
> I believe at this point the subgroup should review the draft sent on Jan.
> 12 and Michael’s responses from Jan. 22 and Jan. 24.  I think the goal
> would be to get plenary 2nd reading on the next plenary call on Feb. 8.
>
>
>
> Hope this provides some clarity.
>
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* ws2-transparency-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-transparency-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *McAuley, David
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:34 PM
> *To:* ws2-transparency at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-transparency] Recommendation from Göran
>
>
>
> Thanks Thomas,
>
>
>
> Michael and Chris, I have two questions, prompted in part by this note
> from Thomas and Ed Morris’s e-mail this past weekend about the role of the
> Complaints Officer.
>
>
>
> The questions are these: will there be another draft report? (I thought
> some wordsmithing might follow the plenary meeting), and how will we assess
> when we have reached consensus on a final report?
>
>
>
> Through a couple of wordsmithing cycles some of my concerns have been
> addressed. But when I read the final report (or reread the last one if that
> is final) I could have a remaining concern or two.
>
>
>
> And so I am asking about determining consensus for submitting a final
> report to the plenary.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154
>
>
>
> *From:* ws2-transparency-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-transparency-
> bounces at icann.org <ws2-transparency-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Thomas
> Rickert
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:57 AM
> *To:* ws2-transparency at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Ws2-transparency] Recommendation from Göran
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Göran asked us co-chairs to convey to your group that you might wish to
> take a closer look at the report he issued, which can be found in the
> President’s corner of the website. He says a lot of things the CCWG is
> asking for in terms of transparency can be found there.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or
> confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If
> you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
> delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this
> message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete
> this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply
> e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not
> relate to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its
> subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of
> them. No representation is made that this email or its attachments are
> without defect.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-transparency mailing list
> Ws2-transparency at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-transparency
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-transparency/attachments/20170127/2583953c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCWG_WS2_Transp Report Jan 27 edits.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 99708 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-transparency/attachments/20170127/2583953c/CCWG_WS2_TranspReportJan27edits-0001.docx>