[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May

[theo geurts]

In support of Marc and Jen here.

I think mixing them (PDP's) will put to much pressure on the current 
thick whois IRT and we won't gain the synergy effects. As mentioned 
before the T/T is rather complex.

Let's discuss this more as Jen suggested in Amsterdam.

Thanks,

Theo Geurts


On 12-5-2016 15:50, Jennifer Gore Standiford wrote:
>
> Fabien,
>
> I agree with Marc and I have also expressed my concerns and opposition 
> to the GNSO council regarding the idea to bundle T&T and CL&D 
> implementation. We all appreciate the notion to consolidate the 
> various WHOIS related projects. My recommendation is as follows: 1) 
> T/T needs to move onto an IRT process 2) The IRD recommendations need 
> to be evaluated and as appropriate be incorporated into other GNSO 
> policy work on WHOIS, at a minimum as it relates to the T/T IRT and 
> RDS PDP.
>
> I understand ICANN staff has put this item on the agenda for the GDD 
> Summit and I look forward to participating in this discussion.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jennifer
>
> *From:*gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Anderson, Marc
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:39 AM
> *To:* Fabien Betremieux; gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff 
> Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May
>
> Fabien,
>
> In response to proposal #3 below regarding the bundling of T&T and 
> CL&D implementation, Verisign’s response is to recommend they be 
> treated separately and we do not support combining the two.
>
> I do want to express our appreciation for the effort to consolidate 
> some of the multiple RDDS related initiatives currently underway.
>
> That said, I have discussed this with my colleagues internally and we 
> feel that there are not great synergies between T&T and CL&D and like 
> others on the IRT are concerned that T&T would unnecessarily delay the 
> work of this IRT.  As such it is our recommendation that a separate 
> IRT be formed for T&T.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marc
>
> *From:*gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org> 
> [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Fabien Betremieux
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:46 AM
> *To:* gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff 
> Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May
>
> Dear IRT members,
>
> As discussed during our meeting, we would like to request you provide 
> your input regarding Staff’s question and proposals to address the 
> public comments received on our initial implementation plan 
> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en).
>
> A a reminder, these question and proposals are the following:
>
> Question:
>
>   * Is the issue created by referencing the 2013 RAA in a Consensus
>     Policy applicable to registries a matter of policy or
>     implementation ?
>
> Proposals:
>
>  1. Referral of the Registry vs. Registrar Expiration Date confusion
>     for consideration by the RDS PDP Working Group
>  2. Optional display of the Registrar Registration Expiration Date,
>     with mitigation measures similar to that of the AWIP policy if
>     displayed
>  3. Proposed Bundling of T&T and CL&D implementation (more details on
>     slide 4 of our presentation this week, available at:
>     https://community.icann.org/display/TWCPI/IRT+Meetings)
>
> Please provide your input in response to this email by Wed. 11 May COB 
> in your time zone.
>
> Please also note that we hope to focus our next IRT meeting (Tue. 10 
> May) on the implementation of the transition from thin to thick.
>
> Best Regards
>
> -- 
>
> Fabien Betremieux
>
> Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager
>
> Global Domains Division, ICANN
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt/attachments/20160512/692bf229/attachment-0001.html>