[gnso-rpm-wg] Critique of INTA survey
kurt at kjpritz.com
Thu Aug 31 11:38:34 UTC 2017
I remember Jeremy describing the paper. I was referring to the email chain you started entitled on the heels of that paper, " 99%+ reduction in sunrise utilization rate per TLD supports EFF call for elimination of sunrise,” that, to me, established a link between your arguments and the paper.
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:46 AM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
> "1) George refers to the EFF and in past emails has particularly
> referred to the EFF white paper, "Which Internet registries offer the
> best protection for domain owners?” as justification for eliminated
> the Sunrise RPM.....Yet, because it is “published," this is the source
> cited often on this list as authority for eliminating Sunrise."
> I don't recall ever referencing that particular paper in this working
> group. I advocated elimination of the Sunrise RPM long before that
> paper was even published. That paper only came out in late July:
> and as per the archives, no one ever replied to that thread. I've
> searched past emails, and can't find myself referencing it all here.
> My reasoning for elimination of sunrise isn't based at all on that
> study, especially since the reasoning predated that study.
> Not only has it not been "cited often", it's unclear anyone but Jeremy
> has even mentioned it.
> If you have a link to me (or anyone else for that matter) referencing
> that paper on this PDP mailing list, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, I
> think you should correct your statement.
> George Kirikos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg