[IOTF] IOTF Call #7 - Meeting Notes (27 April 2016 @ 19:00 UTC)
yuko.green at icann.org
Wed Apr 27 21:57:00 UTC 2016
Dear members of the IOTF,
Please see below the meeting notes and chat history from today's IOTF call.
The presentation material, audio and AC room recordings are now posted at
https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation under "Meetings & Work
Sessions" section. The transcript will be made available within the next few
*** Meeting Notes ***
Implementation Oversight Task Force (ITOF) call #7
27 Apr 2016 @ 19:00 UTC
Please note that this meeting is being recorded.
To mute or unmute, select *6 (Star-Six)
If you would like to review the last call(s), the recordings and
presentation materials are posted publicly here:
1. Opening Remarks
2. Implementation Items
* RZERC Charter: Obtain final agreement from IOTF on the draft
* IANA Escalation Mechanism: Is there any other comments and
feedback from the IOTF on Chuck's clarification?
* Document Review Process & Timeline: 1) Continue discussion
regarding document review process, and 2) review timeline
4. Closing Remarks
Apology - Donna A, Jonathan R
IANA Escalation Mechanism
* Response provided by Chuck is based on the discussion with the
* Keep this item open until next Wednesday call
* RZERC charter - Remove the "(possibly as Chair)" from Composition
* RZERC charter - Delete "AS" from the first sentence from "Records
of Proceedings" (ICANN)
* RZERC charter - Add "minutes shall be posted as soon as possible"
at Records & Proceeding section (ICANN)
* RZERC charter - Replace "as prudent" with "as appropriate" at the
last section of the Meetings (ICANN)
* Forward the term sheet of the PTI formation documents to the
client committee for Sidley's review (ICANN)
* ICANN-PTI Contract - Add Annex M as an additional input source
* Pull language off of draft ICANN bylaws re: ICANN-PTI contract and
circulate to IOTF mail list (ICANN)
* ICANN to discuss internally how the ICANN-PTI contract can be
shared before the whole draft is ready (ICANN)
Yuko Green: Hello everybody, welcome t o IOTF call #7
matthew shears: hi could you remind me when the RZERC doc was circulated -
Yuko Green: @Matthew: It was Monday at 7pm PDT through IOTF mailing list
matthew shears: OK thanks
Allan MacGillivray: Hi everyone. That's me on 5335.
Yuko Green: Who may be phone # 5335?
Chuck Gomes: Hi all
Yuko Green: Thank you Allan
matthew shears: phone is live Allan
James Gannon: Hi All
Yuko Green: You have scrolling control as RZERC charter is on slide 4 and 5
James Gannon: Yeah I think that was from the proposal but can be done away
matthew shears: that needs to be made clear then
Alissa Cooper: I still think this is over-specifying a bunch of details that
should be left to the committee itself, but I am giving up on that line of
Alissa Cooper: the document needs an edit pass for grammar
James Gannon: Works for me
matthew shears: in the last sentence under meetings what does the word
prudent refer to?
matthew shears: shouldn't it read as appropriate?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): lol
James Gannon: If Chcuk is happy I am
matthew shears: + 1 to Chuck's clarifications
Avri Doria: sound like reasonable repsonses to me.
Avri Doria: and as a member of that team they were what i remembered.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): th
Avri Doria: is there an open issue of incompatitiblity between this and the
Avri Doria: makes sense to wait for a another week.
Avri Doria: to make sure that is is closed.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): not that I am aware of (yet) Avri but NP with
Avri Doria: next call is a good compromise
Chuck Gomes: Does Paul want a full week?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): next Wed call if we run the Mon one as well
Paul Kane: agree
matthew shears: where does responsibility for drafting the contract between
ICANN and PTI lie?
Alissa Cooper: that's on the next slide
matthew shears: :) thanks
matthew shears: shouldn't the IOTF review the full draft before it goes to
Grace Abuhamad: The document was forwarded to the Client Committee here:
Grace Abuhamad: It's the process
Chuck Gomes: It seems to me that the full drafts can be reviewed by the IOTF
at the same time that Sidley is reviewing them.
matthew shears: ok
Chuck Gomes: When are the ICANN Bylaws targeted for approval?
Paul Kane: Agree Alissa
matthew shears: 27th May?
Chuck Gomes: Thanks Matthew.
matthew shears: understood - lets do it inparallel with Sidley
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): yup
Russ Housley: This structure impacts all of the operational communities, so
we would like to know the proposed way forward as soon as possible
James Gannon: +1 Russ
matthew shears: + 1 Russ
James Gannon: Principles in bylaws and details in contract would be what i
Trang Nguyen: @Russ: Understood, Russ.
Chuck Gomes: I have to drop off. Thanks all.
matthew shears: I think that it would be useful of key parts of teh contract
were shared as they were available rather than waiting on the full draft
Lise Fuhr: Bye Chuck
James Gannon: I think thats still a little fuzzy Trang at the moment
James Gannon: On how much control there is over that contract from the
provisions in the ICANN bylaws
matthew shears: assuming the ICANN bylaws don't change
Alan Greenberg: I suspect it will be easier to change the PTI Bylaws than
the PTI-ICANN contract.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): thx Greg
Paul Kane: Alan - agree
Paul Kane: But Bylaws have a formal process
matthew shears: + 1 Alissa on structure
matthew shears: and +1 on review as well
Alan Greenberg: Don't recall for sure, but I think PTI Bylaws are purely up
to PTI Board. Appealable because ultimately controlled by ICANN, but no
Russ Housley: @Alan: One contract with three parts or three options is fine.
A contract for the naming functions with options for the other two is quite
Alan Greenberg: @Russ, my reference was just with regard to Pauls statement
about things in the PTI Bylaws as opposed to the contract.
Paul Kane: Agree Lise
matthew shears: we would also read the whole but it might expedite things
and assuage some concerns along the way
Lise Fuhr: @Trang it is more the structure than the details
Allan MacGillivray: Many of the principles in Annex C that are important to
the ccTLD community are also in the darft contract terms that were attached
to the CWG proposal. They were deemed to be so important that they are
mentioned twice so we need them reflected in nthe bylaws and the PTI
Lise Fuhr: Thank you Trang
Avri Doria: thanks
matthew shears: thanks all
Lise Fuhr: All
James Gannon: thanks trang thanks yuko
Allan MacGillivray: Thanks everyone.
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail: <mailto:yuko.green at icann.org> yuko.green at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5096 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the IOTF