[Neobrahmigp] IP review of Oriya LGR 20181220

Mon Feb 11 17:21:00 UTC 2019

Dear all,

I have amended page no 09 after the first para in section 4, of Oriya LGR
Proposal document version 2.11 as per the email on 02-02-2019 by Dr Sarmad
in the document attached.

*Quote*
The Oriya (Odia) script LGR proposal was published for public comment to
allow those who had not participated in the NBGP to make their views known.
The NBGP analyzed all comments received to finalize the proposal. The
analysis of public comments can be accessed online given at [106].
*Unquote*

Kindly use this document attached for your further reference.

Best Regards
Kuldeep Patnaik

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:42 PM Kuldeep Patnaik <kuldeep.patnaik3 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> After reviewing the feedback from IP, the LGR proposal for Oriya has been
> updated with the action points which are mentioned below.
>
> The document Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_Doc Ver 2.11.doc  and Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_Doc
> Ver 2.11.pdf is now renamed as version 2.11 is attached in this email.
>
>
> *IP Feedback:* (1) The .docx proposal would still benefit if the citation
> of specific characters would* as much as possible *include the code
> point, glyph and character name (especially, for example, in 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
> and 3.9). This would make it much more easily read by non-Oriya reading
> people.
>
> *Action Taken: *Updated the proposal with code point, glyph and character
> name as much as possible (especially, for example, in 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
> and 3.9).
>
> *IP Feedback:* (2)There is a missing space in the heading "10.3 Oriyaand
> Telugu".
>
> *Action Taken:* Updated a space in the heading "10.3 Oriya and Telugu".
> This seems a technical issue. While converting from word to PDF, sometimes
> spaces between words are not embedded in PDF version.
>
> *IP Feedback:* This and many other instances of missing spaces and small
> copy edits have been addressed by the suggested edits in the attached
> document. The GP is encouraged to review and accept these or make
> additional changes.
>
> *Action Taken: *Updated missing spaces and small copy edits have been
> addressed.
>
> *IP Feedback:* (3)The discussion of variants vs. confusables could use
> some small edits to align better with the terminology and explanation used
> across the Root Zone LGR. (See attached document).
>
> *Action Taken: *Accepted the small edits suggestion by IP.
>
> *IP Feedback:* (4)Halant should be capitalized to match usage elsewhere.
> (See attached document).
>
> *Action Taken: *The LGR is now updated capitalized “H” in Halant.
>
> *IP Feedback:* (5) Page 12, the fourth page of the Public Comments
> Feedback for  ... Oriya, claims (in 3.4 and 3.6) that ISO 15919 is to be
> used for lossless transliteration of the characters, but in fact the IPA
> seems to be used everywhere for phonetic renderings, thus, for example,
> using j rather than y.
>
>
>
> *Action Taken: *ISO 15919 system is not used for transliteration of any
> scripts in LGR proposal of NBGP for this purpose. Hence, the public
> comments feedback doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9MbBfNBQZAFc9SOYpt0lgeeyM3N-DsUP173J4Vb948/edit>
> for Oriya (Odia) script is also updated to avoid such confusion going
> forward regarding ISO15919 system for transliteration of Oriya (Odia).
>
>
>
>
>
> *XML*
>
> The updated XML passes our tool
>
> No Action required
>
>
>
> *TXT*
>
> The label file has been verified.
>
> No Action required
>
>
>
> Further, I have added the following text after the first para in section
> 4, as per the email from Dr Sarmad d*ated* 02-Feb-2019, s*ubject*:  Proposed
> text for NBGP methodology after public comment (refer page no 09 and page
> no 31)
>
>
> The Oriya script LGR proposal was published for public comment to allow
> those who had not participated in the NBGP to make their views known. The
> NBGP analyzed all comments received to finalize the proposal. The analysis
> of public comments can be accessed online given at [106].
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Kuldeep Patnaik
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:20 PM Kuldeep Patnaik <kuldeep.patnaik3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Dr Sarmad,
>> I will revert to you soon.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Kuldeep Patnaik
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:45 AM Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Kuldeep, all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find below (and attached) the review of the proposal by IP.
>>> Kindly let us know if you have any queries.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We look forward to the final version, incorporating the feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sarmad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> To: Neo-Brahmi Generation Panel
>>> From: Integration Panel
>>> Subject: Updated Oriya Proposal dated 20181220
>>>
>>> The IP has reviewed the updated proposal and has a few additional
>>> comments and suggestions as set out below and in the attached document
>>> where suggested edits are shown in redline. Once these are reviewed,
>>> accepted or altered by the GP, the proposal is ready to be finalized.
>>>
>>> *DOCX*
>>>
>>> (1) The .docx proposal would still benefit if the citation of specific
>>> characters would* as much as possible *include the code point, glyph
>>> and character name (especially, for example, in 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9).
>>> This would make it much more easily read by non-Oriya reading people.
>>>
>>> (2) There is a missing space in the heading "10.3 Oriyaand Telugu".
>>>
>>> This, and many other instances of missing spaces and small copy edits
>>> have been addressed by the suggested edits in the attached document. The GP
>>> is encouraged to review and accept these or make additional changes.
>>>
>>> (3) The discussion of variants vs. confusables could use some small
>>> edits to align better with the terminology and explanation used across the
>>> Root Zone LGR. (See attached document)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (4) Halant should be capitalized to match usage elsewhere. (See attached
>>> document).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (5) Page 12, the fourth page of the Public Comments Feedback for  ...
>>> Oriya, claims (in 3.4 and 3.6) that ISO 15919 is to be used for lossless
>>> trasliteration of the characters, but in fact the IPA seems to be used
>>> everywhere for phonetic renderings, thus for example using j rather than y.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *XML*
>>>
>>> The updated XML passes our tool
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *TXT*
>>>
>>> The label file has been verified.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20190211/21706226/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_Doc Ver 2.11.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 2796923 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20190211/21706226/Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_DocVer2.11-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_Doc Ver 2.11.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 5960704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20190211/21706226/Proposal-Oriya-LGR-20190211_DocVer2.11-0001.doc>