[Ws2-ombudsman] FW: [Ext] Re: Ombudsman Assessment: RFP Overview

Wed Dec 21 13:59:41 UTC 2016

Klaus,

I added  "deemed relevant by ombuds sub group and SO/AC". Beforehand there
was just" deemed relevant" so it wasn't clear deemed relevant by whom. I
don't think you disagree with that addition, you can add your modification
to the document.

I totally agree with your second point and I added a couple of addition to
the document to suggest that the ombudsperson should understand ICANN, its
community and its structure.

Thanks

Farzaneh

On 21 December 2016 at 03:20, Klaus Stoll <kdrstoll at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear All
>
> Looks like we are making progress on this one. Below 2 short comments.
>
>
>    1.
>
>       *Review Work Method and Criteria*
>
> The work methods are expected to include the following:
>
>    -
>
>    One-on-one interviews with individuals who are deemed relevant by
>    ombudsman sub group and SO/ACs to the examination. *Why are we
>    limiting the interviews to those deemed relevant by Ombudsman sub group and
>    SO/AC? The Assessment should be able to interview everybody it thinks *
>    *necessary** AND all those deemed relevant by sub group and SO/AC.*
>
>
>    -
>
>    Consultation with the Community *The relationship to the community is
>    crucial, and this consultation should be better and more clearly defined.
>    As it stands it says nothing and all.*
>
>
> I think we can not stress enough the need of understanding and working
> with the community and examination of the Ombudspersons role and
> relationship within the whole ICANN community.
>
> Yours
>
> Klaus
> On 12/21/2016 5:16 AM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Added some comments questions and texts to Seb's document.
>
> There are a couple of important things that we should not overlook:
>
> 1. The reviewer has to completely understand ICANN structure and process.
> Basic knoweldge is fine but the reviewer has to attend a couple of
> community meetings and see how things work. The reviewer (as someone
> suggested in the doc) should also attend ICANN meeting in Copenhagen.
>
> 2. one and a half month for the review is simply not enough as Seb also
> pointed out. I believe it should be extended.
>
> Thanks
>
> On 20 December 2016 at 14:01, Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the very timely turnaround, Sébastien.
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> If I may, I would like to encourage those who are using MS Word to add
>> their comments to the file Sébastien just sent (attached to this email). It
>> will make the review easier (and quicker) and assure that you will not
>> submit comments that are identical to those of your colleagues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks and best wishes,
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday 20 December 2016 at 11:43
>> *To: *Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
>> *Cc: *"ws2-ombudsman at icann.org" <ws2-ombudsman at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Ws2-ombudsman] Ombudsman Assessment: RFP Overview
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Lars,
>>
>> Thanks for the draft.
>>
>> Please find attached with my comments, questions and proposals.
>>
>> Ready to answer any question.
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> SeB
>>
>>
>>
>> Sébastien Bachollet
>>
>> +33 6 07 66 89 33 <+33%206%2007%2066%2089%2033>
>>
>> Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr[sebastien.bachollet.fr]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sebastien.bachollet.fr&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=J4rVei4WZIn6-raGBj5dwYkl2jzyfta0KTxH92lGiro&m=k-gs9i_UX-77NEgRsNGq2pIpi0IjfnrH8dvPYcWuQLw&s=2_jCo89V2UtZmbhOrOdI-RpA-JktgJv5Dt1gliRZGGc&e=>
>> /
>>
>> Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> *De : *<ws2-ombudsman-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Lars Hoffmann <
>> lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
>> *Date : *lundi 19 décembre 2016 à 23:49
>> *À : *"ws2-ombudsman at icann.org" <ws2-ombudsman at icann.org>
>> *Objet : *[Ws2-ombudsman] Ombudsman Assessment: RFP Overview
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Ombudsman Subgroup,
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks again for making time on yesterday’s call for our RFP
>> presentation. While I promised the document by Wednesday, I am pleased to
>> let you know that we have already a draft ready for your consideration
>> (attached to this email). Please note that in the Draft all dates are
>> placeholders- hence the highlights.
>>
>>
>>
>> *We would very much appreciate if you could submit your comments by
>> Friday 23 December 16:00 UTC (local times[timeanddate.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.timeanddate.com_worldclock_fixedtime.html-3Fmsg-3DSubmit-2BComments-2Bto-2BOmbudsman-2BAssessment-2BRFP-26iso-3D20161223T16-26p1-3D-253A&d=DgMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=J4rVei4WZIn6-raGBj5dwYkl2jzyfta0KTxH92lGiro&m=k-gs9i_UX-77NEgRsNGq2pIpi0IjfnrH8dvPYcWuQLw&s=MSm9wS0c8sayrssqvhjAS5QpThdJQnUZ2kCgwHbhbKg&e=>).
>> *The deadline is important so that we can get the RFP posted in the
>> first week of January.
>>
>>
>>
>> While it is up to the Subgroup to determine how to provide comments and
>> feedback, from our experience *on-list commenting* is often the most
>> efficient way. Depending on how that progresses, you may then decide to
>> hold a call later in the week if need be. The MSSI Team (Larisa, Charla,
>> Lars) would of course be happy to attend such a call- if you think we could
>> be of assistance.
>>
>>
>>
>> With regards to advertising the RFP once it goes online, we would be very
>> grateful, as we mentioned before, for any *suggestions about
>> organizations/associations* that we could leverage *to publicize the
>> call*.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to us at any
>> time.
>>
>> Many thanks and best wishes,
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> PS:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Ws2-ombudsman mailing
>> list Ws2-ombudsman at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l
>> istinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-ombudsman mailing list
>> Ws2-ombudsman at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-ombudsman mailing listWs2-ombudsman at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-ombudsman mailing list
> Ws2-ombudsman at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-ombudsman/attachments/20161221/fc70056d/attachment-0001.html>