[CCWG-ACCT] Requirements based on latest discussions
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Jan 30 22:28:32 UTC 2015
Recap of latest requirements mentioned on the CCWG accountability list
*Type of requirement*
*Requirement or issue to be considered*
Comments by Kavoouss
*Work party*
Decision making
Footing /Weights for SO/ACs ?
We need to examine the required footing. I do not see that we have reach
any agreement on equal footing between SO/AC Include stakeholder groups in
decision making ?
Who are stakeholders ? Are we referring to SO /AC?
WP1 / WP2
Decision making
Vote based on SO/AC internal processes
We need to normalized these different internal procedure if we want to use
it outside SO/AC
WP1
Decision making
Based on consensus ? Supermajority ?
As a General Rules, we need to look for consensus, in rare and exceptional
cases, Voting.
Supermajority has different criteris, 2/3, 374 or 4/5
WP1
Independence
Conditions of independence with regards to the Board (not having been part
of Board, or being barred from joining for several years)
Not having been part of Board for the last v YEARS at the time of
decision making
WP1 / WP2
Mediation
Mediation as first step of review / redress mechanism
Please specify between which entities we need mediation?
WP2
Mediation
Designation of Ombudsman to conduct mediation
Ombudsman is used in the current situation. We have not seriously discussed
why we need an individual with such an authority
WP2
Membership
Is it free of cost ?
We need to be careful not proposing any criteria which contradict the
inclusiveness
WP1
Oversight accountability
Ability for the respective groups to recall their delegate or member
Whart do we mean by recall?
Hold a meeting, hold an assembly ?
WP1
Oversight Accountability
Is it a paid or unpaid position ?
We should be careful to make every thing no profit.
Participation costs Yes , Salary , be careful of competition and unintended
consequences
WP1
Scope
Type(s) of Board decisions to be submitted to prior approval, or that could
be overturned
We need to be careful, on the one hand, not to put any unnessary obstacle
for day-to-day functioning, and on the otherhand, not make the Board
totally authoritative. Thuis we have to establish some very general
criteria for decisions to be submitted to prior approval, or that could be
overturned i ,
WP1
Scope
List of rights of “members” or “delegates”
In the exercise of their duties, the members/ delgates ( elected or
appointed ) shall serve, not as representing their respective communities
, affiliated entities nor a region, but as custodians of an international
public trust. In particular, each member/delegate shall refrain from
intervening in decisions directly concerning the member’s / delegate,s own
entities to which she or he is affiliated
No member / derlegate shall request or receive instructions relating to
the exercise of her/ his duties for the for the international / global
community ( ties ) from any government , civil society, private sector,
technical community and Acadenmic or an affiliated thereof, or from any
public or private organization or person. Members/ delgates shall refrain
from taking any action or from participating in any decision which may be
incompatible with their status defined above.
WP1
2015-01-30 18:34 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Over the last 10 days, several threads took place discussing member or
> delegate options, including very relevant insights and ideas. At the same
> time, our Work Parties 1 & 2 are just getting formed, so I felt we were
> running the risk of not making the most of these discussions.
>
> I have created a wiki page in an attemps to sum up, in terms of
> requirements, the ideas that were exchanged in these threads, and that
> should form an input to WP1 & WP2. I have probably missed some of the ideas
> exchanged, and maybe was not able to capture some of these right.
>
> But I would suggest we try to elaborate on this, and then hand this on to
> the WPs. Please feel free to add & comment.
>
> This is the link to the doc : https://community.icann.org/x/JwQdAw
>
> Best,
>
> --
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150130/9319c3b7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Recap of latest requirements mentioned on the CCWG accountability list.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 21171 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150130/9319c3b7/RecapoflatestrequirementsmentionedontheCCWGaccountabilitylist.docx>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list