[bylaws-coord] Bylaws Finalization process clarification

[Greg Shatan]

Theresa,

Can you please explain the proposed process for taking the comments and
deciding what changes will be made to current draft bylaws, and then making
those changes?  That seems to have been overlooked in your answer.

The purpose of any comment period, including this one, is for the comments
to be evaluated and for the proposed document to be revised in accordance
with comments chosen by some body as appropriate to adopt.  Summarizing the
comments and providing them to the community has little value unless there
will be a process where some group (including the community's
representatives) will act upon those comments and change the document
accordingly.

I look forward to your reply.

Best regards,

Greg Shatan

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Theresa Swinehart <
theresa.swinehart at icann.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> To the communications below -
>
> ICANN will be providing a unified summary of the public comments as part
> of the process to completion (provided by 26 May).  With regards to the
> bylaw coordination group, we would suggest it is kept in place until the
> bylaws are adopted by the board in case there are any questions. On the
> timeline, it remains as set out, with the expectation to transmit the
> bylaws to NTIA by end of May. We expect the preparation of the summary of
> the public comments to occur shortly after the completion of the public
> comments and provided to the community (goal is this to occur from 21-26
> May). We anticipate the Board to meet shortly after to adopt the new Bylaws
> (pending no significant changes), and provide confirmation to the NTIA on
> the adoption of the Bylaws by the end of May.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Theresa
>
>
>
>
> From: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby at icann.org>
> Date: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:15 AM
> To: Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
> Cc: "bylaws-coord at icann.org" <bylaws-coord at icann.org>, ACCT-Staff <
> acct-staff at icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>,
> Bruce Tonkin <bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws Finalization process clarification
>
> Dear Mathieu,
> Theresa Swinehart will respond today to all your questions below.
> Best regards,
> Cherine
>
> On 11 May 2016, at 10:42, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As we finalize the CCWG-Accountability comment regarding the Draft Bylaws
> some questions have surfaced regarding how these comments will be examined,
> and what the process moving forward will be. In order to respond to our
> group (and our lawyers), could the Board or staff leaders share what the
> process is planned to be, especially :
> -          Who will review / analyze the public comments ?
> -          Whether this coordination group will remain the central point
> to make any decision in case of conflicting comments, before Board
> consideration ?
> -          What is the anticipated timeline ?
>
> Thanks a lot for providing these clarifications.
>
> Best,
> --
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************
> _______________________________________________
> bylaws-coord mailing list
> bylaws-coord at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bylaws-coord mailing list
> bylaws-coord at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160512/80e30cb7/attachment.html>