[council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability

[Edward Morris]

James/Donna/Heather,
  
 Thanks guys for all of your hard work. This is good stuff.
  
 I've been in communication with our Member, a few members of the NCSG PC and one other NCSG Councillor and it appears that the preference in the NCSG, at least amongst some,  is that we hold separate votes on each of the twelve recommendations. I thought about holding off on letting everyone know but figured it might help for planning purposes if staff and our leadership knew of our intent.
  
 As the wording of the Proposed Approach indicated that voting on each recommendation individually would be possible if requested by any Council member please note that is my intent to make such a request and I do not expect that intention will change between today and our open Council meeting in Marrakech.
  
 Respectfully,
  
 Edward Morris
  
  
  
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 9:30 PM
To: "GNSO Council List" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability   
 Colleagues -
  
 After working with Donna, Heather and the GNSO Council Staff, I'm pleased to present a Draft Motion for the GNSO Council to consider Work Stream 1 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Report (attached).   
  
 Additionally, we have developed a framework outlining the Council's approach when it ultimately moves to vote on this motion (also attached).  While there is only one motion, the Council also has the option to conduct a vote on each of the 12 recommendations separately.  If we go this route, each recommendation will include a discussion / statements by Councilors / SGs /Cs, and finally a vote.  
  
 Once the vote is completed, we will report the results, along with any written statements from Councilors, to the co-chairs of the CCWG-Accountability.
  
 Please review and provide feedback.  We can discuss in depth during our next session on 29 FEB.
  
 Thank you--
  
 J.
  
  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160225/386a2b98/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attachment 1
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1570 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160225/386a2b98/Attachment1.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motion on CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations - 25 February 2016.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 21430 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160225/386a2b98/MotiononCCWG-AccountabilitySupplementalFinalProposalonWorkStream1Recommendations-25February2016.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposed Approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal - 25 February 2016.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 20461 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160225/386a2b98/ProposedApproachCCWG-AccountabilitySupplementalFinalProposal-25February2016.docx>