[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For your review - updated RDS Statement of Purpose

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Stephanie for spending considerable time on this.

First I want to say that you are correct that we should not yet assume that a RDS system is needed so the edits you made to fix that seem fine to me.  Others are of course welcome to comment on this if they like.

Second, it seems to me that we as a WG need to discuss your input on the list before our next WG meeting next Tuesday as well as in that meeting.  In that regard I have a couple questions for you:

1.       Will you be able to participate in the meeting on 4 October?

2.       Can you provide any updates to your redline no later than Monday, 3 October?
When you listen to the recording from this week's meeting, you will hear Alan and I both express concerns about dragging our work on a RDS Statement of Purpose out much longer.  My personal goal as chair is to try to wrap it up for the most part on next week's call.  At the same time I want to make sure that we address the issues you raised.  To help us continue to make timely progress, I sincerely hope that you can respond affirmatively to both questions.

In the meantime, I encourage everyone to review Stephanie's comments and respond to them on the list.

Chuck

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephanie Perrin
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:44 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For your review - updated RDS Statement of Purpose


 and here is the draft redline version

On 2016-09-28 22:34, Stephanie Perrin wrote:

I apologize for missing the last two meetings.  I was travelling and had difficulty connecting.  I have listened to the call of the 21st, and I am going to listen to the next one as soon as it arrives.  I have a number of concerns with the current draft purpose statement, and am consulting my NCSG colleagues on a proposed redraft which I have done.  As soon as I hear back from them I will share it with the list, understanding that this is not the same as being on the call.  My concerns are basically the following:

1.  The purpose of the purpose clause exercise was, as far as I understood it, to come up with a succinct purpose for the exercise in which we are engaged....to limit the exercise to the minimum until such  time as we have agreed on policy, as it is generally understood that many policy issues have crept into the WHOIS and RDS without benefit of a full PDP delberation.  Our remit is not to assume those policy issues are a fait accompli, it is to examine them, thus the limited scope of the purpose clause.  It is a business requirements statement for the exercise.

2.  Several implicit assumptions appear to have crept in, namely that an RDS is necessary, and that data will be released through it.  We have not got there yet.  Discussion of rationales for the RDS is straying way too far, in my view.

3.  While a statement of purpose is necessary for the interpretation of ICANN's policies with respect to the collection, use, retention and disclosure of personal information in the context of its registration activities, this is not it.  We cannot through this exercise set up a purpose for that, because it requires policy decisions, and we are not there yet.  A goal can be compliance with national and regional law, and with internationally recognized human rights obligations, but not crafting the actual purpose statement.  I hope that is clear, it is a wee bit convoluted.

I will send my proposed redline version as soon as possible.  Apologies once again for missing the calls.

Stephanie Perrin

On 2016-09-28 13:17, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
I found (and fixed) two more instances of "gTLD domain names". Update attached.

Scott

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:12 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For your review - updated RDS Statement of Purpose

Dear All,

Please find attached for your review the updated statement of purpose which aims to reflect the changes discussed during yesterday's meeting. You are all encouraged to review this version, especially the section 'Specific Purposes for Registration Data and Registration Directory Services', and share your input with the mailing list prior to next week's meeting. Also note that a couple of WG members (Marc & Fabrizio) volunteered to provide updated language for two specific parts of the document which have been flagged accordingly, so please hold your comments on those parts until the proposed language has been circulated.

Best regards,

Marika

Marika Konings
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.





_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg





_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160929/40fe0ff9/attachment.html>